The American approach rests on incentives, integration, and long-term stability. The Iranian system operates through fear, ideological rigidity, and permanent confrontation. These are not competing strategies. They are incompatible visions of power.
Iran and the Limits of U.S. Diplomacy
by
February 2026
Recent Articles
Mr. President, Listen to the Father in You
The reported plot involving Ivanka Trump cannot be treated as just another intelligence item. It is not merely a security file, nor simply another example of the Iranian regime’s global campaign of intimidation. It touches something more direct, more human, and more sacred: The attempt to reach a President through his daughter. The man now […]
Academic Freedom or Ideological Capture?
When does academic freedom protect scholarship — and when does it become a cover for political ideology?Edward H. Kaplan, William N. and Marie A. Beach Professor of Operations Research at the Yale School of Management, and a member of the Executive Committee of Yale Jewish Academics and Friends, addresses this issue in this powerful analysis.
Taiwan, Iran and the New Great-Power Bargain
Mordechai Chaziza offers an in-depth analysis of the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, suggesting that it may go far beyond trade, tariffs, or diplomatic theater.At stake, he argues, could be something far more consequential: the emergence of a new great-power equation.A Senior Lecturer at Ashkelon Academic College and a Research Fellow at the […]
