In this conversation with Jacob Heilbrunn, Eka Tkeshelashvili—former Deputy Prime Minister of Georgia and senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund—offers a strategic reading of Russia’s trajectory from 2008 to today.
She argues that the war against Georgia was not an isolated conflict, but Putin’s first “test run” — a calibrated experiment in using force against a sovereign neighbor while assessing Western resolve. Ukraine, she explains, represents the continuation and escalation of that imperial logic.
She also examines Putin’s ideological framework, including his rehabilitation of Stalin as a symbol of centralized, unchecked power. For her, the war in Ukraine is not merely territorial — it is a deliberate attempt to erase Ukrainian nationhood itself.
Finally, she urges the United States to adopt a clearer and more coherent strategy in the Black Sea region, warning that strategic ambiguity only creates space for Moscow to expand its influence.
Putin’s Imperial Strategy Through the Eyes of Eka Tkeshelashvili
by
March 2026
Recent Articles
View from Israel: Q&A with Meir Ben Shabbat
The Jerusalem Strategic Tribune was pleased to speak about current events with Meir Ben Shabbat, head of the Misgav Institute for National Security & Zionist Strategy, in Jerusalem. He served as Israel’s national security advisor from 2017 to 2021. Our conversation is below. In what ways does President Trump’s decision to resume the war against […]
Rise of the New Spartas
A new dynamic has taken hold as Russia’s full-scale war of aggression in Ukraine grinds through its fifth year. Kyiv now strikes with regularity and precision deep in Moscow’s heartland, crippling energy infrastructure and supply lines. Advances are a thing of the past along a frozen front where drones impose a fearsome kill zone no […]
China Wants Peace in the Middle East-but Not the Burden of Enforcing It
China has become one of the Middle East’s largest economic stakeholders. However, when war threatens the region, Beijing still looks more like a diplomatic actor than a security provider. That paradox lies at the heart of China’s Middle East strategy. As its dependence on regional energy, trade, and infrastructure has expanded, so too has its […]
